15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.watchfactoryjf.com 300 true 0
theme-sticky-logo-alt
Swiss Watch Smackdown: SIHH’s Organizer Says Tudor and Longines Don’t Qualify as Fine Watchmaking

Swiss Watch Smackdown: SIHH’s Organizer Says Tudor and Longines Don’t Qualify as Fine Watchmaking

The Geneva-based Fondation de la Haute Horlogerie, which arranges the yearly SIHH (Salon International de la Haute Horlogerie), has quite recently conveyed a significant hit to Rolex’s sister image Tudor and Longines among a couple of others, pronouncing they don’t qualify as “fine watchmaking.” The SIHH originator, whose expressed mission is to advance fine watchmaking universally, just led a three-year survey of 86 watch marks and verified that solitary 64 of them fit the bill for the honorific, Bloomberg reports.

Tudor is a sister company to Rolex.

Tudor and Longines

“Technical and valuable, Fine Watchmaking draws its authenticity from aptitude and advancement,” FHH, set up by the Richemont Group, Audemars Piguet and Girard Perregaux in 2005, states. “The Fondation, through its exercises, encourages and advances Fine Watchmaking’s estimations of inventiveness, culture, and custom.” To proclaim that Tudor and Longines don’t qualify is an immense affront, horologically talking regardless of their lavish touch on present day watches . It might likewise be viewed as a one-sided move since SIHH’s originators are rival brands, however the Fondation says board individuals who decided on the rundown were evaluated for clashes of interest.

Longiness has been limited and not, at this point considered “fine” watch”.

Fondation de la Haute Horlogerie

The Fondation is considering the survey the “primary comprehensive exertion to arrange top of the line Swiss brands in a business where the view of selectiveness approaches terrifically significant boasting rights” trying to carry lucidity to the shopper, Bloomberg notes. The Fondation further partitioned the brands it says qualify as fine watchmaking into four sections. Both Tudor and Longines, which didn’t make the cut by any means, are all around regarded in the watchmaking community.

Cartier, TAG Heuer, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet and Rolex are remembered for the classification of notable watchmaking houses, while Parmigiani and Romain Jerome are refered to as contemporary brands, Montblanc is recorded as an extravagance brand, and any semblance of Kari Voutilainen are know to be known as “craftsmans makers”. The Fondation gauged seven measures in building up the rundowns including innovative work, plan, history, dispersion, and brand picture. We should not fail to remember that Rolex is the most trustworthy company named by Forbes  for 2017.

Tudor Oyster Prince Submariner 7924 is unquestionably a nearby comparative with the Rolex Submariner.

The review will be rehashed each a few years, however up to that point any semblance of Tudor and Longines, mysteriously barred in our view, should fight a flood of negative press and assumptions that makes certain to emerge from the censure. Zuzanna Pusz, an expert at German venture bank Berenberg, says the blacklisted watch brands shouldn’t anticipate that their stock should tank anyway particularly as SIHH is equipped more towards the business than consumers.

“Swiss-made mark, high complications, style, and straightforward brand inclinations are even more significant than such definitions and presumably will not influence interest or appeal,” all things considered, she reveals to Bloomberg Pursuits . Stay tuned for additional on the unstable topic.

SIHH Qualified: List of “Fine Watchmaking”
Previous Post
SIHH Qualified: List of “Fine Watchmaking”
A Cut Above the Rest: Diamond Day-Date 118348
Next Post
A Cut Above the Rest: Diamond Day-Date 118348